5/3/2007

Vintage: Trailers

Posted in Vintage at 11:17 am by Sam

The movie trailer is a well-understood advertising form today, but where did it come from? In the 1910s, trailers were shown after the main feature (hence the name) as a way of boring patrons out of the theater to make room for the next showing. The studios and exhibitors were slow to catch on to the fact that, hey, the advertising potential here is tremendous. But by the late 1920s, not only were trailers valuable advertising, they became the bread and butter of third party companies set up to make them.

The first trailer, though it wasn’t recognizable by the definition of the term we use today, was shown in 1912 or 1913 (sources differ) for a serial called The Adventures of Kathlyn. This was the first serial with the cliffhanger endings that would soon become standard for serials. Kathlyn is thrown into the lion’s den. “Does she escape the lion’s pit? See next week’s thrilling chapter!”

Eventually, this idea evolved into showing a preview of the next movie the theater had on its schedule. If the theater already had a print of the film (actually it would be unlikely an exhibitor would receive it earlier than the night before the first showing), maybe it would just show the first reel of the film unaltered. Maybe the projectionist would cut the good parts out of the actual print, splice it together into a “trailer,” then reassemble the film afterward. More likely, the theater would come up with its own way of advertising the next feature after the current one had ended.

As I said in the beginning of this, part of it was to get patrons out of the theater when a movie ended. Moving pictures were so new and so novel, they’d come in the afternoon and stay all night and enjoy multiple showings of the same program. The idea sounds crazy, but in the 1910s, the novelty of moving pictures hadn’t worn off, and it’s not like people were overladen with on-demand entertainment choices anyhow. Why, in 1915, most people didn’t even have one hundred cable channels. So to make room for later showings, why not take a break, show some stills for next week’s shows? Instead of spending the rest of the night in the theater, come back next week for even more fun.

Paramount was quickest to catch on to trailers as a real advertising form. In 1916, they started distributing their own trailers, and in 1919, they set up their own trailer division within the company.

The other studios were slower on the uptake. Trailers were often still seen as a problem for the exhibitor, not the studio, which is consistent with the Ballyhoo posts we’ve been running here, which are collections of marketing stunts given to exhibitors, not the studios, to advertise their films. (Of course, the line is further blurred when, starting in the late 1920s, studios increasingly own the movie theaters until that practice is finally ruled a monopoly and broken up.)

Trailers

But as I say, the other studios were slow to prioritize the production of movie trailers, and that opened the door for third party companies to spring up and fill the need. In particular, in 1920 the New York-based National Screen Service was founded, a company that offered various advertising services to the movie studios, including and in particular the production of fancy trailers and, later, posters. The venture was a smash success, because of the way the revenue structure was set up. Rather than making its money from the studios, the NSS would make its money by renting out use of the trailers to the theaters. Theaters would pay a fee to use the promotional materials, then send them back when they were done with them. Moreover, the studios would receive a royalty on revenue collected from rentals of the trailers for their films. This arrangement surely looked attractive, even to a studio that owned a bunch of theaters.

The NSS was so successful, in fact, that in 1940 the major studios signed exclusive contracts with it to produce and distribute advertising materials. This arrangement lasted all the way up to the 1970s, waning from then until the early 1990s. With the advent of the multiplex and the standardization of movie poster sizes, movie advertising became more and more streamlined until finally it became more economical for the studios to take back those responsibilities. Ultimately, Technicolor bought out the NSS in 2000.

Trailers

Other trailer companies did exist, such as the Advance Trailer Service Corp, an ad for which is shown here. But none of them could compete with the NSS until the 1960s, when studios started increasingly looking to break away from the uniform style of the NSS trailers, which tended to punch up the stars and feature all kinds of outrageous superlatives zipping onto the screen with different graphical effects. So starting in the 1960s and definitely in the 1970s, the NSS’s business became gradually less built on trailers and more on posters and stills and other types of advertising materials. Trailers were increasingly done either in-house at the studios or by other third-party companies. Some of my favorite trailers were for the Alfred Hitchcock films of the 1950s and 1960s. Rather than contracting those out to the NSS, Hitchcock tended to oversee those directly, every bit as involved in the creation of his trailers as his actual films. He often shot new footage for them and, very memorably in his trailers for Psycho and The Birds, appears on-screen and delivers a dry, darkly comic monologue about the film to his audience.

But although the NSS is no longer the king of the movie trailer world, it’s interesting how movie trailers still generally look the same. Trailer editors find a formula that works, and they stick with it.

And that opens the door to some great parodies now and again. My two favorites: The Comedian and Five Guys In a Limo.

5 Comments »

  1. Sam (405) said,

    May 3, 2007 at 11:22 am

    While rewatching those trailers, I stumbled upon this absolutely hilarious item about Don LaFontaine, the king of the movie trailers: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wkhdy6bavuk

  2. Jeffrey (84) said,

    May 3, 2007 at 12:08 pm

    I loved the trailer for The Comedian when it first came out. Probably my fave trailer was for Star Wars Episode I and the money shot of Darth Maul’s double sided lightsabre. The movie was of course shockingly awful. This just goes to show that some trailers are better than the actual movie it’s promoting.

    As mentioned, trailers are an art in themselves especially the Hitchcock ones, however most contemporary ones are awful cos they actually explain the entire plot.

  3. joem18b (231) said,

    May 3, 2007 at 12:37 pm

    So what’s your take on the Grindhouse trailers?

    Kevin Smith in his podcast this week talks about a new Jaws documentary and mentions Percy Rodriquez, known to some as the king of the 70s voiceovers (e.g., the Taxi Driver and Jaws trailers). His last trailer before retiring was Mall Rats.

    And if you want to rent a voice (Burt Reynolds, for example), check out http://www.cedvoices.com/search_results.php?mode=id&keyword=lafontaine&keyword.x=0&keyword.y=0.

  4. WarpNacelle (48) said,

    May 3, 2007 at 4:00 pm

    I’ve always wondered, especially within the last 5 - 7 years or so, if Mr. LaFontaine has felt like he has been reading the same spots over and over again, just re-arranged differently.

    He has the best job in the world.

  5. KatiesGoldenDust (1) said,

    May 3, 2007 at 10:28 pm

    Very interesting information. I love these historical segments. I’d rather sit here reading this than read what I need for school. This is much more interesting. Thanks for the factoids!

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.